|









| |
Conservation
Ted Frink
PFMC
Press Release about 2008 Salmon Closure
Unfavorable Ocean Conditions Likely Cause Of Low
2007 Salmon Returns Along West Coast
Unfavorable Ocean Conditions Likely Cause Of Low 2007
Salmon Returns Along West Coast
ScienceDaily (Mar. 3, 2008)
—
NOAA scientists are reviewing unusual environmental
conditions in the Pacific Ocean as the likely culprit
for the dramatically low returns of Chinook and coho
salmon to rivers and streams along the West Coast of the
United States in 2007.
Researchers from NOAA's Northwest and Southwest
Fisheries Science Centers are comparing data on the low
food production of the California Current in 2005 that
occurred when this year's returning salmon would have
been entering the ocean from their natal streams to feed
and grow.
The cold waters of the California Current flow southward
from the northern Pacific along the West Coast and are
associated with upwelling, an ocean condition caused by
winds that bring nutrients to the ocean's surface and is
the main source of nourishment for the ocean's food web.
In 2005 a southward shift in the jet stream, delayed
favorable winds and upwelling for the California
Current, which normally begins in spring.
The winds instead arrived in mid-July, causing high
surface water temperatures and very low nutrient
production within the near-shore marine ecosystem.
"We are not dismissing other potential causes for this
year's low salmon returns," said Usha Varanasi, NOAA
Fisheries Service Science Center Director for the
Northwest Region. "But the widespread pattern of low
returns along the West Coast for two species of salmon
indicates an environmental anomaly occurred in the
California Current in 2005."
New data released by the Pacific Fisheries Management
Council indicate the 2007 returns of fall Chinook salmon
to the Sacramento River in California's Central Valley
were approximately 33 percent of what fishery biologists
expected. Projections for 2008 are substantially lower
than last year's estimate.
Coho salmon returning to spawning streams in California
and Oregon are also considerably lower than predicted. A
preliminary analysis found an average 27 percent of the
parental stock returning in 12 streams monitored in
California. Even though coho returns appear to improve
along the coast from south to north, Oregon Coast coho
salmon had less than 30 percent of their parental stock
return.
Coho salmon are listed as either endangered or
threatened under the Endangered Species Act in the
Central/Northern California and Southern Oregon
watersheds.
Adapted from materials provided by NOAA National Marine
Fisheries Service.
Delta Smelt Petition
See
Petition
DAM REMOVAL INFO
http://www.pcl.org/pclf/pclf_water_sanclementedam.asp
Conservation News
Central Valley Project
Improvement Act Public Meeting
he Bureau of Reclamation and the U.S. Fish & Wildlife
Service will host a public meeting to present the
California Central Valley Project Improvement Act (CVPIA)
Annual Work Plans for Fiscal Year 2007. Presentations at
the meeting include: the Anadromous Fish Restoration
Program; the San Joaquin River Basin Resource Management
Initiative; the Refuge Water Supply Program; and the
Water Acquisition Program. The meeting will be from 1300
to 1600 HRS on 10 April at Federal Building, 2800
Cottage Way, Conference Room C-1001-1002, Sacramento,
CA. Questions regarding the meeting can be directed
towards Shana Kaplan at 916-978-5190 or e-mailed to
skaplan@mp.usbr.gov.
Public comments on implementing
Magnuson-Stevens Act sought
he Magnuson-Stevens Fisheries Conservation & Management
Act (MSA) was reauthorized by the 109th Congress. The
National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) is responsible
for implementing the new regulations created by the
reauthorization of MSA. The new MSA states that
overfishing in all federal commercial and recreational
fisheries be terminated by 2010, which will modify the
National Standard 1 of the Act, also known as the
“overfishing standard.” All fisheries must be regulated
by annual catch limits with accountability measures to
prevent landings exceeding the regulated catch limits.
Additionally, the reauthorized MSA places considerably
more emphasis on science-based management. Until
2 April, NMFS will receive public suggestions on
how to prevent “overfishing” now and in the future. NMFS
will then collect all of the comments, draft a proposal
of specific regulations to implement the changes, and
then another public comment period will follow. NMFS
hopes to complete the project by the end of 2007.
Written comments should be e-mailed to:
annual.catch.limitDEIS@noaa.gov;
or faxed to: 301-713-1193; or mailed to: Mark Millikin,
NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910.
For additional information about MSA see
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/msa2007
or about the MSA “overfishing” implementation read
www.fakr.noaa.gov/notice/72fr7016.pdf.
Auburn SRA General Plan
Announcement of the Auburn SRA General Plan
development which includes the upper American River
North and Middle forks. No mention of fisheries
resources assessment or management objectives in this or
the newsletter
http://parks.ca.gov/pages/21299/files/asraweb.pdf.
Klamath Fish Passage Issues
In the House, Representative Mike Thompson (D-CA)
introduced HR 5213, the Salmon Assistance & Recover Act,
with 35 co-authors from California and Oregon that
would:
•
Provide $81 million in funding for commercial fishermen,
Tribes and related businesses impacted by the restricted
fishing season.
•
Secure $45 million for immediate conservation measures
on the Klamath River, including requiring the National
Marine Fisheries Service to produce a recovery plan for
the salmon population within six months, and to install
and update stream gauges and monitoring equipment,
improve river habitat and build fish passage projects,
and add NMFS staff and resources to better track and
study the Klamath River's salmon in rivers and oceans.
•
Require NMFS to submit an annual report updating
Congress on the progress of its efforts to boost water
quantity, improve water quality and increase salmon
populations on the Klamath River.
S. 2649 was introduced in the Senate
and is very similar, while S. 2662 asks only for the $81
million in direct assistance. Since the introduction of
the House and Senate bills, Senator Gordon Smith (R-OR)
attempted unsuccessfully to insert language into HR
4939, the Emergency Supplemental Appropriation bill
approved by the Senate, to provide funds for the Iraq
war and disaster relief to victims of Hurricane Katrina
and other natural disasters. The Smith language would
have included the $81 million for disaster relief for
the west coast fishing industry but the Senate
Parliamentarian held that because the fishing closures
stem from regulatory actions (not a physical natural
disaster) therefore the request for aid was non-germane.
Senator Ron Wyden (OR) is currently holding up the
Senate Magnuson Act reauthorization bill (S. 2012), also
seeking $81 million in disaster aid.
12:08/03. PACIFICORP PROPOSES "TRAP AND HAUL"
ALTERNATIVE FOR KLAMATH DAMS: The cost of installing
fish ladders and screens circumventing turbines to
protect and create passage for migrating salmonids
through the four lower Klamath hydropower dams, Iron
Gate, Copco I & II and J.C. Boyle, owned by Pacificorp
on the mainstem of the Klamath River, is estimated at
$200 million dollars. Pacificorp, currently
participating in settlement negotiations as part of the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (FERC)
re-licensing process, is required to create ways for
fish to get around the four dams as part of the
re-licensing process. To get out from under the $200
million dollar cost, Pacificorp has instead proposed
trapping migrating fish and hauling them upstream to
spawn, which Pacificorp believes will cost much less
than creating fish passage at the dams. Since 1917 these
dams have block fish passage to hundreds of miles of
once used salmon spawning and rearing habitat, and were
built without any consideration of fish passage.
Glen Spain of the Pacific Coast
Federation of Fishermen’s Associations said, "We have
never believed that trap and haul is a substitute for a
free-flowing river. Nor does any of the science support
it." PCFFA is pushing for the complete removal of the
four lower dams, which currently represents only 1.9% of
Pacificorp’s overall energy production. In a new special
appeals process that was created in the new Energy Bill
only a few months ago, hydroelectric companies are
allowed to make alternative proposals to fish passage
requirements of federal agencies, which all recommended
full volitional fish passage for the Klamath.
Organizations, Tribes and agencies can then challenge
the company’s proposals and request a hearing to make a
determination.
If Pacificorp, now owned by
MidAmerican Energy Holdings Co. of Des Moines, Iowa,
loses the appeal, Pacificorp would then be required to
install fish passage on their dams at full costs.
However, none of these dams produce much power, and the
California Energy Commission has previously issued an
opinion that loss of the 161 megawatts of total power
they can produce would have "insignificant effects" on
the region’s power supply. The dams, and the warm water
reservoirs behind the dams, do have devastating impacts
on lower river fisheries, however, including encouraging
fish parasites.
On 11 April, PCFFA and other
organizations and Tribes all filed a challenge to
PacifiCorp’s "trap and haul" proposal, stating the
proposal does not meet the requirements of being as
biologically effective as dam removal or fish ladders.
Dam decommissioning is currently thought to cost less
than installing fish passage on the 4 dams. See the 30
April AP article in the Daily News
http://www.tdn.com/articles/2006/04/30/area_news/news03.txt.
12:08/04. REMOVAL OF KLAMATH DAMS
GAIN MOMENTUM: By approving a 2006 emergency rule
season, the Pacific Fisheries Management Council is
trying to ensure that enough salmon will get back to the
Klamath to maintain commercial, recreational and Tribal
fisheries. However, with the future survival of juvenile
salmon heading to the ocean under question as current
Klamath River conditions continue to deteriorate, the
Pacific Fishery Management Council voted on April 24th
to formally support the removal of the four key dams,
acknowledging that these dams affect fish habitat and
passage.
The San Joaquin River Restoration Reports have recently become available
for viewing on the Farm Water Coalition Web site
http://www.cfwc.com/.
Note: "It is important to note
that this Draft Restoration Strategies Report does not constitute a
restoration plan for the San Joaquin River. This document is the
culmination of a reconnaissance, planning-level effort designed to
identify and explore conceptual approaches to restoring the San Joaquin
River in order to inform a settlement process. The development of a
restoration plan for the San Joaquin River will require the acquisition
and consideration of more site-specific information and a broader
involvement by local landowners and stakeholders." (Stillwater Sciences
2003)
September Update of Salmonid ESA and CESA
Status
California Senate Bills of Interest
New Book on Present and Historical
Distribution of Salmonids in the SF Estuary
National Wildlife Federation - FEMA Court
Ruling
|